Quantcast

Bruce McCarthy is the Chief Product Person at UpUp Labs, where he and his team are at work on Reqqs - the smart roadmap tool for product people. User>Driven was created to help product people be more effective at their challenging jobs.

« Chandler and Outlook: separated at birth? | Main | When not to do your research »
Tuesday
Apr032007

Webapps vs. desktop apps

Over the last 6 months I've been asking IT managers whether they prefer webapps or classic desktop apps for deployment to their employees. Most have said they prefer webapps but they use whatever does the job best. I like this pragmatic answer. It tells me these IT folks are sensitive to the requirements of the business (and hopefully of the users).

Ryan Stewart at ZDNet has a good list of reasons for when to use each platform. I think he glosses over the need for offline access in his comments at the end, but the list seemed otherwise solid. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Barry Coleman replies:

"Why not have the best of both worlds? Adobe's Apollo project (http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo) aims to allow you to create web applications in HTML/JavaScript or Flex/Flash and deploy them as desktop apps with full local access. It's in alpha now and it works pretty well for an alpha, I've deployed an existing Flex app to it without any real issues."

I agree completely. I posted on the potential for Apollo a while back:

http://www.userdriven.org/blog/2007/2/14/apollo-shoots-for-the-moon.html
April 11, 2007 | Registered CommenterBruce McCarthy

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>